Aussie model Abbey Lee Kershaw is naked AGAIN, this time for The Last Magazine styled by Keegan Singh and photographed by Martin Lidell.
She is looking a bit young in this photoshoot … she’s clearly module of the moment, but I just have to say, I’m no prude but what’s going on with all the nudity for FASHION magazines? I’ve spoken about this on twitter before and nudity for fashion is rife and I thought fashion photography was meant to be about the CLOTHES.
What do you think? Are you over all the nudity too? What do you think about the shoot?
[Source]
Love,
Sassi
Your Pop Culture Gossip Girl
Related posts:
- Abbey Lee Kershaw naked for Numero & Muse Abbey Lee Kershaw is another hard-working Aussie model, she’s just...
- Naked Glory for Muse with Abbey Lee Kershaw Last week we previewed Greg Kadel’s cover spread for #20...
- Abbey Lee Kershaw: Vogue Australia March 2010 This is so awesome, Vogue Australia has dedicated their March...
- Abbey Lee Kershaw all feathers for Numero #109 Abbey Lee Kershaw is the muse for Numéro #109 magazine...
- Abbey Lee Kershaw Nude again for Numéro #110 Aussie model Abbey Lee Kershaw has clearly become a muse...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.
{ 3 trackbacks }
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
Agree soooooo much. I buy fashion magazines to look at fashion, not boobs and bums!
And I own a lingerie label so I am no prude either haha, if I wanted naked girlies there are other places to go!
You two have an odd definition of naked. In every shot she has more material on her body than the average bikinied beach goer. You just have certain ingrained prejudices about which patches of skin are appealing and which are not. Or is it that your idea of marketing and selling fashion involves piling on as much product as possible for those precious square inches of glossy magazine real estate?
Furthermore, the shots are a great study in body shape, how it is perceived, and how the clothing affects perception.